James Cameron's Avatar and racism.
Jan. 12th, 2010 03:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As a person of pallor, I am concerned about what people are saying about race and class issues as displayed by the movie. And so I have decided to play devil's advocate over on io9's article about the racism inherent in Avatar's handling of the film's themes.
In his off-screen backstory our protagonist, Jake Sully, went from being one of the most entitled class of 'haves' to being a pitiable 'have-not' by being a Marine who has lost the use of his legs. He had been an able-bodied white male of above-average attractiveness from an educated family, so he had most of the favorable attitudes our culture has available going for him, and then was forced to deal with how much of what he had was unearned when all those privileges were taken away. The discrepancy between what our culture says it is and what it shows to minorities was painfully revealed. Then he was immersed in a radically different culture in which he had to earn his place by working for everything. Considering the emotional satisfaction of hard-earned success versus how his previous existence showed itself to be a false victory with all attendant disappointment, how is it surprising or racially motivated that he defected to a more rewarding culture?
Rich people of any color, people who are attractive or educated, people who are of the racial majority in their culture: anyone who has privilege can have it taken away. Achieving success after you've had a brush with the flawed standards of our culture has got to feel like being a kid and winning a chess game with your uncle. No matter how much he insists that you did it all by yourself, his compromised credibility takes all the savor out of the game.
So here's the thing: some privileged people are tired of privilege. When people of privilege realize their success is a sham, life's accomplishments become unsatisfying. Most people of ethical caliber will then seeka level playing field to prove themselves on and become part of a meritocracy. AVATAR is their story.
In his off-screen backstory our protagonist, Jake Sully, went from being one of the most entitled class of 'haves' to being a pitiable 'have-not' by being a Marine who has lost the use of his legs. He had been an able-bodied white male of above-average attractiveness from an educated family, so he had most of the favorable attitudes our culture has available going for him, and then was forced to deal with how much of what he had was unearned when all those privileges were taken away. The discrepancy between what our culture says it is and what it shows to minorities was painfully revealed. Then he was immersed in a radically different culture in which he had to earn his place by working for everything. Considering the emotional satisfaction of hard-earned success versus how his previous existence showed itself to be a false victory with all attendant disappointment, how is it surprising or racially motivated that he defected to a more rewarding culture?
Rich people of any color, people who are attractive or educated, people who are of the racial majority in their culture: anyone who has privilege can have it taken away. Achieving success after you've had a brush with the flawed standards of our culture has got to feel like being a kid and winning a chess game with your uncle. No matter how much he insists that you did it all by yourself, his compromised credibility takes all the savor out of the game.
So here's the thing: some privileged people are tired of privilege. When people of privilege realize their success is a sham, life's accomplishments become unsatisfying. Most people of ethical caliber will then seeka level playing field to prove themselves on and become part of a meritocracy. AVATAR is their story.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-12 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 08:57 pm (UTC)Yup, here by way of Angela!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 12:18 pm (UTC)Glad to see you two interacting. :D
no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 04:45 pm (UTC)That he had no possessions wasn't held against him, neither did anyone else (as denoted by communal sleeping arrangements), so it can't be any form of plutocracy or aristocracy. What they held against him was that he was a walking liability with no skills to offer. The Na'vi seem to have an oligarchy of the best hunters and tree-speakers as their ruling class, and Neytiri may be the daughter of the rulers, but she also shows her capacity to do every skill that needs doing and teaching. A society that ranks people according to their accomplishments as such is a meritocracy. I stand by my assertions.
A Different Perspective
Date: 2010-01-17 08:37 pm (UTC)"The main male character has to be from another planet. He is a traitor of his highly civilized planet, where uncontrolled development has destroyed their planet to the point where they could no longer live there. They send a few of them to Earth to continue their species. Because we, the human beings, are sympathetic but also eye their high technology, we decided to start a high-tech energy project which will destroy planet Earth.
The more advanced the technology, the greedier you become. These foreign species would therefore be more evil than human beings. But among them there is this traitor, who, due to various reasons, falls in love with a female human working in an environmental NGO. Because of love, he revealed to human beings that the energy project would destroy Earth. Under his leadership (that it is led by an alien but not an American would be more acceptable to the world), human beings fight against the aliens in an ultimate war."
Re: A Different Perspective
Date: 2010-01-18 06:10 am (UTC)I'm sure someone would still see ass-hattery, possibly in the form of sexism that the alien leader was male and the human woman couldn't lead her own people to freedom, or possibly some form of classism debate about the divide between the technological first world being corrupt and the more agrarian third world being underrepresented. But it could still be cool.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-27 05:55 pm (UTC)But anyway. Hi, I'm Wil, I hope this isn't creepy or anything, because it really isn't intended to be. >.>
Hi!
Date: 2010-01-28 12:54 am (UTC)Feel free to read me, etc. Very little is friend locked here.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-28 06:46 pm (UTC)Also, nice to meet you!